Original Research

Amos: ’n teologie van bedreiging?

J. L. Helberg
In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi | Vol 32, No 3 | a1648 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v32i3.1648 | © 1998 J. L. Helberg | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 13 June 1998 | Published: 13 June 1998

About the author(s)

J. L. Helberg,, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (434KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


The book of Amos contains many undertones of threat, except in the epilogue which, according to many scholars, is redactional The question thus comes to the fore whether this characteristic implies that God is seen by Amos as a God of threat for whom one can only have fear. This article, however, points out Amos’ moral justification of God's deeds. Israel's actions, on the other hand, display a self-centredness and a lack of theocentric and personal approach. Within this framework the history of salvation, especially the exodus and the conquest of the land, as well as the election, covenant and the idea of the remnant, is fossilised and God is made a captive of space, time and relations. However, Amos' proclamation implies that in reality God cannot be made captive - neither of such a religion nor of a theology of threat. Amos envisions a situation in which everything will comply with the real aim set for it/him.


No related keywords in the metadata.


Total abstract views: 1522
Total article views: 1870

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.