Original Research

American Christians for and against Parsifal: Debating the Holy Grail Opera in New York

Frederick Hale
In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi | Vol 51, No 1 | a2267 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v51i1.2267 | © 2017 Frederick Hale | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 09 May 2017 | Published: 11 October 2017


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

The appropriateness of Christian themes in the performing arts has often been debated. Defenders have argued that various media, including drama, can serve as instruments of spiritual edification, while critics have contended that such efforts often eventuate in sacrilege and a vulgarising exploitation of the sacred for commercial and entertainment purposes. A heated debate took place in 1903 when Richard Wagner’s opera Parsifal, which since its première at Bayreuth in 1882 had been hailed as a magnificent representation of redemption and other themes central to Christianity, was staged at the Metropolitan Opera House in New York – its first performance as an opera outside its original venue. Numerous clergymen and lay people in several denominations sought to have the production banned and cautioned fellow Christians against seeing it. Others, generally of a theologically more liberal bent, defended the work. The heated public controversy is placed into historical context and compared with the history of Parsifal in the United Kingdom, where it was widely appreciated without noteworthy opposition.

Keywords

Richard Wagner; Wagnerism; Christian criticism of Parsifal; British reception of Parsifal; American reception of Parsifal

Metrics

Total abstract views: 280
Total article views: 442


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.