Original Research

Teokrasie: beskouings oor Calvyn en die Nederlandse Geloofsbelydenis, art. 36 – ’n bydrae tot ’n noodsaaklike gesprek

P. Coertzen
In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi | Vol 44, No 2 | a150 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v44i2.150 | © 2010 P. Coertzen | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 25 July 2010 | Published: 25 July 2010

About the author(s)

P. Coertzen, Fakulteit Teologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (89KB)

Abstract

Theocracy: views on Calvin and the Confessio Belgica, art. 36 – a contribution to an important debate
John Calvin is often seen as a supporter of theocracy and the Dutch Confession of Faith (Confessio Belgica) art. 36 as a theocratic confession. This article looks at the views of various authors on this matter and comes to the conclusion that Calvin was not a supporter of a theocracy and the Dutch Confession, art. 36 is not a theocratic confession either. The question is then asked where the views of Calvin, the Dutch Confession and various countries (inter alia Switzerland, and the Nether-lands) at the time of the Reformation on the relationship be-tween church and state came from. As an answer to this ques-tion the argument is put that, in reaction to the theocracy of the Roman Catholic Church (as can been found in the Corpus Iuris Canonici), it was a returned the historical view on church and state that had been current since the time of Constantine. These views were also applied in South Africa from 1652-1994. An attempt is also made to show what was new in Calvin’s views on church and state.

Keywords

Calvin; Church And State; Constantinianism; Dutch Confession Of Faith Or Confessio Belgica; Papal Revolution; Theocracy

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3174
Total article views: 2649

 

Crossref Citations

1. PERSPECTIVE OF MAX WEBER’S THESIS ON THE ETHICS OF PROTESTANTISM AND ITS RELEVANCE TO THE STYLE OF CHRISTIANITY IN MALUKU
Leonardo Stevy Pariyama, Jhoni Lagu Siang
Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews  vol: 7  issue: 5  first page: 459  year: 2019  
doi: 10.18510/hssr.2019.7552