Original Research

Die Belydenis van Belhar en die ekumene teen die agtergrond van die Drie Formuliere van Eenheid

A. le R. du Plooy
In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi | Vol 44, No 2 | a151 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v44i2.151 | © 2010 A. le R. du Plooy | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 25 July 2010 | Published: 25 July 2010

About the author(s)

A. le R. du Plooy, Skool vir Kerkwetenskappe, Potchefstroomkampus, Noordwes-Universiteit, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (107KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share


The Confession of Belhar and ecumenism against the backdrop of the Three Forms of Unity
This article focuses on the Confession of Belhar and in- vestigates from an ecclesiastical and theological perspective the question whether this confession should be accepted and added as a fourth confession to the existing Three Forms of Unity. The following aspects are addressed: the origin and content of the Confession of Belhar, the ecclesiastical and theological reaction within the family of Dutch Reformed Churches as well as in the reformed ecumenical world. A critical analysis of the content is made and evaluated, and in con- clusion attention is given to a few options with regard to the place of the Confession of Belhar in the reformed ecumenical world in the future. A comparison between the Three Forms of Unity and the Confession of Belhar shows a definite difference in quality. The Confession of Belhar is not of a similar standard with regard to the theological and doctrinal content and structure of the Three Forms of Unity, and does not add quality or neglected faith-related value to these existing creeds.


Apartheid; Confession; Confession Of Belhar; Ecumenism


Total abstract views: 2210
Total article views: 3155

Crossref Citations

No related citations found.