Original Research
Die teologies-polemiese gerigtheid van Genesis 1-3: implikasies vir die gereformeerde leer oor die erfsonde
In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi | Vol 43, No 1 | a216 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v43i1.216
| © 2009 N. Vorster
| This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 26 July 2009 | Published: 26 July 2009
Submitted: 26 July 2009 | Published: 26 July 2009
About the author(s)
N. Vorster, Skool vir Kerkwetenskappe Potchefstroomkampus, Noordwes-Universiteit, Potchefstroom, South AfricaFull Text:
PDF (143KB)Abstract
The theological polemic purpose of Genesis 1-3: implications for the reformed doctrine on original sin
This article focuses on the polemic nature of Genesis 1-3 and the implications thereof on the reformed doctrine regarding original sin. In the first place the views of the creation narratives as historical-literal and mythological material are discussed. Thereafter the article proposes that the creation narratives must be treated as theological material with a polemic and prophetic purpose. The implications of this for the reformed doctrine on original sin are subsequently discussed.
This article focuses on the polemic nature of Genesis 1-3 and the implications thereof on the reformed doctrine regarding original sin. In the first place the views of the creation narratives as historical-literal and mythological material are discussed. Thereafter the article proposes that the creation narratives must be treated as theological material with a polemic and prophetic purpose. The implications of this for the reformed doctrine on original sin are subsequently discussed.
Keywords
Creation; Foederalism; Original; Polemic; Realism; Sin
Metrics
Total abstract views: 3157Total article views: 2880